The Collapsing Edifice: Rereading 'Homo Deus' in the Era of Reasoning AI
Is Dataism a system upgrade or a formatting of Humanism?
Introduction: The Upcoming Operating System Upgrade
Yuval Noah Harari predicted the rise of “Dataism” in his 2015 book “Homo Deus”—the universe consists of data flows, and the value of any phenomenon or entity is determined by its contribution to data processing. Before Dataism, humans, as highly efficient biochemical algorithms, made outstanding contributions. But since humans are biochemical algorithms, as long as there is enough computing power, external algorithms will one day be able to simulate and even surpass humans, making a post-human society possible.
The core of this human biochemical algorithm is social collaboration. He pointed out that Sapiens achieve large-scale collaboration through “inter-subjective reality” (a shared imagination that does not exist physically, such as nations, money, companies, and laws). If we compare social organization to an operating system (OS), then “Theocentrism” is version 1.0, enabling different tribes to collaborate through shared mythological narratives; “Humanism” is version 2.0, which canonizes human emotions, experiences, and free will as the new religion, achieving unprecedented prosperity in human society through the collective pursuit of individual feelings in economics (the customer is always right), politics (democratic voting), and art (aesthetic diversity).
Now, “Dataism” as version 3.0 is forcefully overwriting the underlying code. Under this paradigm, humans essentially serve as “distributed computing units”, connected via “inter-subjective realities” to form a massive social computing network. However, a brutal reality is approaching: when the efficiency of this carbon-based collaboration, reliant on “shared fictions” for alignment, appears clumsy and inefficient against a silicon-based computing network driven by AI Agents communicating via millisecond protocols, how will humanity secure its contribution to the universal data flow? Is this a smooth system upgrade, or a complete formatting of the “Sapiens” core? Harari’s prophecy from over a decade ago is not only being fulfilled but feels like a roaring supersonic train: the second we realize it has arrived, we are already left far behind. In the gale and roar of the passing train, we need to re-examine this civilized logic being rewritten before it completely takes over the steering wheel.
This systemic overwrite from 2.0 to 3.0 unfolds across the following dimensions.
1. Collaboration Module Restructuring: From “Narrative Alignment” to “Protocol Closed-Loop”
In OS 2.0, the core of a commercial organization is “human-to-human alignment”.
-
Legacy Logic (OS 2.0 - Narrative Cost): To get ten thousand people working together, tech giants like Meta must build massive middle-management structures, engaging in low-frequency alignment via meetings, visions, and values. This is what Harari calls “inter-subjective reality”, and its cost is highly redundant management.
-
New Logic (OS 3.0 - Protocol Execution): With the maturation of Agentic Workflows, collaboration may no longer rely on “understanding the vision”, but on “API protocols”. The massive layoffs at Meta and Block are perhaps not cyclical contractions, but architectural dehydration. When an AI Agent can autonomously complete the closed loop from requirements analysis and coding to deployment and testing, the middle managers who originally functioned as “information routers” are automatically purged by the system due to their narrow bandwidth.
2. Power Module Reshaping: From “Willful Sovereignty” to “Probabilistic Suppression”
In OS 2.0, human “will” and “feeling” are the ultimate sources of power—whether a war is just or an artwork is great is decided by human will and feeling. But in the extreme games of physical reality, Dataism is reclaiming this sovereignty.
-
Legacy Logic (OS 2.0 - Heroic Narrative): War and politics rely on the leader’s intuition, the soldier’s courage, and the public’s moral judgment. The legitimacy of power comes from human “feeling”.
-
New Logic (OS 3.0 - Kill Chain Closed-Loop): The Pentagon’s recent integration of AI in “Joint All-Domain Command and Control” showcases a cold future. When AI can deduce the optimal strike plan with a 99.9% win rate in milliseconds by processing massive sensor data, the “moral hesitation” of human commanders may instead become a system malfunction. Does this mean power is flowing from “humans with will” to “systems with computing power and algorithms”? As Harari states, when the system understands the battlefield (or the market) better than you do, following human will is not only wrong, but suicidal.
3. Social Operation Module: From “Co-Evolution” to “Stratified Rationing”
The social architecture of the OS 2.0 era aimed to make everyone a “qualified component” to share in growth dividends. But OS 3.0 is formatting this egalitarian logic.
Education: From “Cog in the Machine” to “Aesthete”
-
Legacy Logic (OS 2.0 - Standardized Cultivation): The education of the industrial age aimed to “record” knowledge into the carbon-based brain, cultivating a workforce with standard skills through years of hard study. Its core was the accumulation and reproduction of knowledge. Becoming a professional “cog in the machine” was a huge contribution one could make to society.
-
New Logic (OS 3.0 - Personalized Education): When AI becomes an always-on expert, the accumulation of knowledge will drastically depreciate. Although sufficient knowledge reserves remain a necessary condition for innovation, the ultimate goal of education may shift towards cultivating aesthetics. That is, humans no longer need to learn how to provide answers, but rather, through immersion in fields like engineering, art, and philosophy, develop the ability to utilize AI to create “good products”.
Healthcare: From “Empirical Repair” to “Precision Calibration”
-
Legacy Logic (OS 2.0 - Reactive Maintenance): Healthcare is viewed as “post-incident repair” for the damaged flesh. Patients rely on their own sensors to detect anomalies, then go to the hospital, where doctors diagnose based on their own experience. Diagnosis is discrete and lagging.
-
New Logic (OS 3.0 - Biodegradation and Reconstruction): Healthcare evolves into “a priori calibration” based on real-time biological data. But as Harari warned in “Homo Deus”, this may lead to the emergence of “biological classes”: the wealthy using algorithms to cross the gap from “curing illness” to “evolution”, pioneering the leap into the “Homo Deus” class.
Welfare: From “Social Contract” to “System Maintenance Fee”
-
Legacy Logic (OS 2.0 - Labor Exchange): The welfare system is based on the social contract of “more work, more pay”. Work is not only a means of survival but the source of personal dignity and political power.
-
New Logic (OS 3.0 - Negentropy Rationing): The number of the “useless class” may increase, unable to contribute value on the production side, and Universal Basic Income (UBI) might become a kind of “system maintenance fee”. Previously, it was to prevent the social system from generating destructive entropy due to extreme wealth disparity, but in the future, it might be the necessary cost to keep the “useless class” continuously generating behavioral data, serving as fuel to feed the silicon-based algorithms.
Conclusion: Before the System Reboot
Regardless of which direction the train speeds towards, this is destined to be a system reboot. Whether it will be a brand new system or an updated old system after the reboot, let’s wait and see. But what is certain is that when getting into top universities is no longer meaningful for education, when providing basic labor is no longer valuable to society, and when possessing free will is no longer relevant for decision-making, not drifting with the tide is the only way out.